Breakwater ASOC / Agentic AI Security Operations Center

Connected evidence.
Agentic reasoning.
Human-controlled response.

An Agentic AI SOC for IT, IoT and OT, with software and cryptographic context for PQC readiness. See how Discover, Provenance and Response connect investigation, digital rehearsal and operational authority.

Breakwater ASOC / How the platform works

Evidence informs the AI.
Human authority governs the action.

Select a layer to explore its role.

CONNECTED OPERATIONS
ITIoTOTSoftwareCryptography / PQC
Fresh evidence informs the next investigation

02 / Agentic AI investigation

Examine the explanation before acting on it.

Multiple AI reasoning roles examine the attack story, challenge competing explanations and preserve dissent. Digital rehearsal helps the team compare a proposed intervention and its assumptions.

SentinelPathfinderSkepticArbiterWarden
Primary explanationAlternative explanation
Digital rehearsalCompare the intervention and its assumptions
OUTPUT FOR THE NEXT STEPA reviewable proposal, with rationale and uncertainty.
See a Council investigation →
DEPLOYMENT & GOVERNANCE
Data locationModel configurationIdentity & permissionsSupported integrations

ASOC operating architecture. Evidence handoffs use explicit mappings; model configuration, adapters and execution responsibilities are agreed for the selected deployment.

Deploy your Agentic AI SOC

Choose how the AI operates
inside your environment.

01 / Data boundaries

Decide what stays local.

Agree where source code, observations, model inputs and investigation records are processed and retained.

Confirm in evaluation

Record approved locations, data movement and deletion requirements.

02 / Model configuration

Know how the AI runs.

Select the available local or connected model configuration, its dependencies and the data it receives.

Confirm in evaluation

Demonstrate the agreed model path and behavior when a dependency is unavailable.

03 / Restricted environments

Check the disconnected workflow.

Evaluate offline dependencies, identity, updates and evidence transfer for restricted or air-gapped operation.

Confirm in evaluation

Verify the required workflow under the intended network restrictions.

04 / Identity & permissions

Separate access from authority.

Name who can inspect evidence, review findings, approve proposals and carry out operational change.

Confirm in evaluation

Review permissions with the customer’s identity and operational owners.

05 / Integration boundaries

Define each supported handoff.

Agree input formats and explicit asset, service and repository mappings. Identify the systems used to execute changes.

Confirm in evaluation

Test selected integrations with representative input and visible failure handling.

06 / Change & verification

Keep the outcome accountable.

Establish target scope, approval, recovery and the fresh evidence required after a supported action.

Confirm in evaluation

Retain the human decision and verify the result against agreed criteria.

A shared responsibility

Assign responsibility for evidence,
authorization and recovery.

Security team

Define the question, authorized inputs and evidence needed to support the decision.

Operations & service owners

Review operational impact, approve change and own recovery and outcome checks.

Breakwater team

Confirm supported configuration, product prerequisites and integration scope for the evaluation.

Explore the product architecture →Read the evaluation guide →

Next steps

Review the architecture against your environment.

Bring your data boundaries, model requirements and integration inventory. Establish the supported deployment and who owns each operational handoff.

Request a demo →Open the PoC planner →