Breakwater ASOC
Your security stack already produces signals. Breakwater ASOC connects those signals to evidence, named authority, and post-change verification so the decision does not disappear between consoles.
Explore the operating modules ↓The operating model
This structure keeps the buyer story clear: one evidence-to-action architecture, with modules that can address a bounded security decision without forcing a wholesale platform replacement.
Module availability and integration depth depend on product maturity, installation, permissions, and the operating boundaries agreed for each deployment.
Breakwater Secure
Secure connects assets, services, vulnerabilities, protocols, certificates, reachability, and candidate attack paths. The goal is not another undifferentiated finding count; it is evidence a team can use to decide what is plausibly exposed and where deeper validation is justified.
Breakwater Assure
Assure preserves exact source, replay evidence, coverage boundaries, review state, and remediation context. Security and engineering can distinguish supported findings from noise without treating model output or scanner output as authority.
Breakwater SOAR
SOAR organizes investigations around attributable evidence, named ownership, bounded actions, approval, rollback, and post-change verification. Where an integration supports execution and the customer authorizes it, automation operates inside the agreed policy boundary.
Module responsibilities
The shared evidence model connects the work; it does not blur ownership or pretend every control belongs in one console.
| Module | Primary question | Evidence focus | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breakwater Secure | What is exposed? | Assets, services, protocols, cryptography, reachability, paths | Prioritized operating picture |
| Breakwater Assure | Can we defend the claim? | Source, replay, coverage, confidence, review | Reviewable finding |
| Breakwater SOAR | Can we act and prove the result? | Cases, authority, scope, action, rollback, verification | Governed response record |
Who owns the outcome
Breakwater gives each stakeholder the context needed for the same decision without erasing differences in responsibility.
Defensible posture, visible uncertainty, and decision records that can travel to leadership and governance forums.
Asset change, exposure, paths, and response context tied to operational consequence.
Validated findings tied to exact source, coverage, ownership, and remediation evidence.
Observable cryptographic inventory, PQC readiness, dependencies, and governed migration planning.
How engagements start
No forced platform migration. Begin with a question, evidence boundary, and deployment model your team can evaluate.
Align the operating problem, stakeholders, evidence sources, and decision criteria.
Test a defined environment or workflow with explicit scope, deliverables, data boundaries, and success criteria.
Expand from validated evidence with ownership, integration, and operating controls agreed in advance.
Research and enablement
Breakwater MCP and the Cyber Analytics course support learning, research, and evaluation. They are intentionally presented separately from the ASOC operating modules.
Product sites and consoles
Product sites explain the module and its fit. Consoles are authenticated operating surfaces provisioned for an evaluation or deployment. Access depends on your organization, tenant, network, and assigned permissions.
Map assets, relationships, exposure, attack paths, and cryptographic readiness.
secure.bwtr.aiTrace, replay, challenge, and review security findings against their source evidence.
assure.bwtr.aiMove from evidence to approved action, rollback, verification, and an attributable record.
soar.bwtr.aiArchitecture
Review the executive reference architecture, trust boundaries, module responsibilities, and deployment patterns.
