Operational interdependence
Bring baggage, terminal and building-system relationships into the investigation where they fall within the agreed scope.
Airports / Breakwater ASOC
Connect the cyber picture
across airport operations.
Baggage systems, terminal infrastructure and supplier connections span multiple owners. Breakwater’s Agentic AI SOC brings their security evidence into one investigation, helping teams agree where exposure exists and who can act.
Agentic AI Security Operations CenterExplore the platform architecture →
Illustrative evaluation scenario
The baggage-system maintenance visit ends. What remains accessible?
A supplier has completed scheduled work. Airport IT, baggage operations and the supplier need to establish whether remaining access matches its purpose and whether shared terminal systems are involved.
- Maintenance supplier
- Baggage-system access
- Shared terminal services
Operating priorities / Airports
Investigate across systems—and responsibilities.
Shared ownership
Identify which airport team, operator or supplier owns the evidence, the system and the permission to change it.
Coordinated response
Prepare an action that responsible parties can review together, with service impact and recovery responsibilities visible.
Discover / Provenance / Response
Turn a supplier-access question into coordinated action.
Trace access across terminal systems.
Discover helps examine observed relationships and candidate routes around the selected terminal service. Confirm boundaries with the airport’s operational owners.
Connect supplier evidence to the review.
Provenance reviews available software and cryptographic evidence; carry supplier questions and source gaps into the shared investigation.
Build a proposal for the right owners.
Response uses the AI Council to examine the access story and alternatives. Prepare a proposal that names the scope, approvers and verification responsibilities across teams.
Agentic AI / Airports
One investigation.
A coordinated response across owners.
ILLUSTRATIVE INVESTIGATION
Which supplier access should end after maintenance?
The Council investigates the access question while retaining the operational boundaries and ownership supplied by the airport.
Establish what the connection actually supports.
Compare the stated maintenance purpose with observed relationships. Surface any assumed connection to shared terminal systems that needs confirmation.
Make the handoff actionable.
Prepare a scoped access proposal with the affected services, evidence gaps and parties needed to review it.
Coordinate authority across the airport.
Airport IT, the operational owner and relevant supplier agree who approves and performs the change, and who checks the result.
Decision & evaluation criteria
Who can close the access—and what must they check first?
Evidence to retain
- Access purpose and the relationships supported by observation
- Airport, service and supplier responsibilities
- The reviewed proposal, named approvers and post-change evidence
How to judge the evaluation
Evaluate one completed maintenance job. Test whether ASOC helps the parties distinguish required access from unresolved exposure and agree an accountable follow-up action.
See the evaluation approach →Next steps
Review one supplier-access handoff.
Choose a baggage or terminal building-system maintenance case. Bring the airport team, operational owner and supplier responsibilities into the evaluation.