Industries / Healthcare

Healthcare / Breakwater ASOC

Make care continuity
part of every cyber decision.

Connected devices, workstations and supplier access all contribute to the care environment. Breakwater ASOC uses agentic AI to investigate their security context and prepare response options for security, clinical engineering and service owners to review.

Agentic AI Security Operations CenterExplore the platform architecture →

Illustrative evaluation scenario

An imaging service needs supplier access. What would changing it affect?

A device-related finding prompts a review of the supplier connection supporting an imaging service. Security, clinical engineering and the department owner need to understand the dependencies before deciding how to respond.

  1. Supplier access
  2. Imaging workstation
  3. Care-supporting service

A service relationship to investigate; not an observed attack path.

Operating priorities / Healthcare

Bring the service around the device into view.

Clinical dependencies

Ask clinical engineering and the service owner which workstations, shared systems and support arrangements the service relies on.

Device support conditions

Include supplier responsibilities, approved assessment methods and maintenance conditions in the investigation.

Care continuity

Review the proposed change with the teams responsible for service availability and recovery.

Discover / Provenance / Response

Build a response clinical engineering can review.

01 / Discover

Understand the device’s connections.

Discover helps review observed identities, relationships and candidate exposure around the selected service, with collection methods agreed by the healthcare team.

02 / Provenance

Trace the evidence behind the finding.

Provenance supplies source-linked software and cryptographic context where analysis inputs are available. Retain gaps that require supplier confirmation.

03 / Response

Prepare options around the care service.

The Response Council examines competing explanations and prepares a bounded proposal. Clinical and technical owners review the dependencies, exclusions and next steps.

Agentic AI / Healthcare

Investigate the exposure.
Understand the consequences for care.

ILLUSTRATIVE INVESTIGATION

Does the supplier connection expose systems beyond the imaging service?

The Council connects the technical finding to a service review that includes clinical engineering and supplier questions.

01 / THE COUNCIL

Separate the finding from assumptions.

Examine the evidence for the access relationship and the affected system’s identity. Surface missing context about the device, workstation and supporting services.

02 / RESPONSE OPTIONS

Make the service dependencies explicit.

Prepare options that state what would change, which support arrangements need confirmation and what evidence the reviewers still need.

03 / HUMAN AUTHORIZATION

Keep the care decision with its owners.

Clinical engineering and the service owner review operational impact and support conditions before authorizing the technical next step.

Decision & evaluation criteria

What can change while preserving the service’s support and recovery needs?

Evidence to retain

  • Device identity and the service dependencies confirmed by clinical engineering
  • Finding sources, supplier questions and unresolved evidence
  • An agreed next step with service ownership and follow-up checks

How to judge the evaluation

Follow one imaging-service access question through investigation and clinical engineering review. Assess whether ASOC makes dependencies and uncertainty clear enough to choose the next step.

See the evaluation approach →

Next steps

Start with one care-supporting service.

Bring security, clinical engineering and the service owner together around an imaging or device-support question. No patient information is needed to discuss the scope.